|
Rambo [2007] | ![Rambo [2007]](http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/514XnhHz82L._SL160_.jpg)
enlarge | Director: Sylvester Stallone Actors: Sylvester Stallone, Julie Benz, Matthew Marsden, Graham Mctavish, Ken Howard Studio: Sony Pictures Home Ent. UK Category: DVD
List Price: £19.99 Buy New: £7.98 You Save: £12.01 (60%)
New (25) Used (8) from £5.00
Rating: 56 reviews Sales Rank: 451
Format: Pal Language: English (Original Language) Rating: Suitable for 18 years and over Region: 2 Aspect Ratio: 2.35:1 Number Of Discs: 1 Running Time: 88 Minutes Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.2 Dimensions (in): 7.1 x 5.4 x 0.6
EAN: 5035822160637 ASIN: B00140UBFY
Release Date: June 23, 2008 Availability: Usually dispatched within 1-2 business days Condition: PRODUCTS ARE BRAND NEW & FACTORY SEALED. UK DELIVERY ONLY. ITEMS SHIPPED WITHIN 48 HOURS BY OUR WELL ESTABLISHED COMPANY.
| |
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Amazon.co.uk review
If you've been wondering what ever happened to ex-Green Beret super warrior John Rambo since he singlehandedly shot up a Pacific Northwest town (First Blood, 1982), returned to the jungles of 'Nam to free U.S. POWs held long after war's end (Rambo: First Blood Part II, 1985), and interrupted the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan long enough to blow lots of stuff up and rescue his old commandant from the Reds (Rambo III, 1988), then Rambo (2008) is for you. Without so much as a IV to dilute the brand name, Rambo --which is what most of us called the second, most iconic film in the series--may aspire to open a new era for a pop legend. But it's a thoroughly mechanical attempt to re-animate a franchise that, absent the anger, frustration, and self-loathing of the post-Vietnam years, has no meaning or purpose. For some time now Rambo (Sylvester Stallone) has been putt-putting along the Thai-Burmese border in a longboat, catching exotic snakes to sell. As for the 60-year civil war in Burma between the brutal government and the Karen independence movement, he ignores it. Enter a party of American missionaries whose dewy blond spokeswoman (Dexter's Julie Benz) asks Rambo to haul them upriver so that they can bring medical aid to the insurgents. After the requisite number of monosyllabic refusals, he does. Soon afterward the do-gooders are in a world of hurt, and he's summoned to lead a squad of mercenaries on a rescue mission. As storytelling, the latest Rambo is the most bare-bones of the bunch. Rambo has little to say, so it's especially galling that Stallone, as director and co-writer, obliges him to have essentially the same conversation at three different points (the final distillation: "Live for nothing or die for something"). The Burmese army goons seem in competition to commit the most hideous atrocity (e.g., child skull-crushing underfoot), the better to justify the eventual, lovingly protracted spectacle of them being eviscerated by high-powered weaponry. Although shot in Thailand, the movie has mostly been photographed in brown, reducing any particular sense of place but, perhaps, perversely increasing our gratitude for the splashes of purple whenever hot metal tatters flesh. --Richard T. Jameson
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 51 more reviews...
Technically brilliant hideously violent tripe . Was i entertained?.....you bet. August 29, 2008 russell clarke (halifax, west yorks) 1 out of 1 found this review helpful
There is a point in Rambo where a Christian aid worker tells John Rambo "taking a life is never right" (even though the men Rambo has just obliterated were going to kidnap and gang rape the one female in their midst ) and you just know that the line is going to have pay off before the films conclusion . Sure enough before the credits roll that same aid worker is hitting a mans head with rock like he's trying to win the biggest cuddly toy on a fairground test your strength machine. By this I took it to mean that the films central message is that no matter how reprehensible killing may seem sometimes it's the only way for the virtuous to survive and evil to be defeated. It's also if this film is to believed extremely messy so best invest in some industrial strength stain remover. Having revived one franchise with "Rocky Balboa [2007]" Stallone obviously felt there was further mileage to be had from the mumbling mixed up Vietnam Vet John Rambo . Some of the ludicrous scenarios, discussed for this by Stallone had Rambo and his family ! kidnapped by white supremacists or Rambo working as a UN diplomat ( the obvious career choice for a man who can hardly string a sentence together) during a terrorist attack on the UN headquarters. Eventually Stallone and co-writer Art Monterastelli came up with a hugely simplified plot where Rambo is working as a snake capturer in Thailand when he is approached by aid workers Michael (Paul Schulze) and Sarah ( Julie Benz) who want him to run them and their colleagues into Burma on his little motorised boat . Burma , it has already been explained in an horrendously graphic montage at the films beginning , is in the throes of a civil war where the militants are wiping out the Karen tribe and the workers want to provide medical , educational and supply aid. Not that Rambo sympathises. "Nothing changes , go home " he grunts . Sarah though appeals to him and before you can mutter extraneous sequel they are off up the river. Once they reach the nearest village the do-gooders go about doing good things until they and most of the village are hideously and realistically slaughtered by the militants. Except some are taken as hostages by the militants , including the fragrant Sarah ( not so fragrant now it must be said) and so some terribly cliched mercenary types are employed to extricate them . Needless to day Rambo is the one required to really save the day and happily this involves brutally eviscerating hundred s of baddies with a gun as big as the biggest gun you can imagine. (very big in my case) My slightly flippant tone may have led you to come to the conclusion that I didn't enjoy Rambo but actually it's great fun in that simplified way that watching really bad men getting their come uppance can be. I watched this film after watching Planet Terror [2007]" and the over the top splatter violence of that palls next to this film .Rambo is eye poppingly violent ( it has a death every 2.43 seconds or something ) but the violence isn't cartoonish . It is stomach charmingly realistic . The films greatest fault though doesn't lie with the violence but rather the characterisation or lack of it. The Rambo of the excellent "Rambo: First Blood [1982]" has morphed from a tragic misunderstood figure into a monosyballic killing machine. The redemptive scene at the end feels tacked on in order to give Rambo some kind of character arc. Worse still the head villain is given little more to do than smoke moodily and glare out through his ever present sunglasses . He is possibly the most underwritten head baddie in cinema history .As for the mercenaries the gobby cockney Lewis (Graham McTavish) is so annoying I wanted him to perish before any of the enemy. The final scene with Rambo spraying around gut busting bullets by the thousands but without hitting any one but the enemy is ludicrous .Yet despite all this I cannot bring myself to fully condemn Rambo. It,s hideously violent tripe but it,s technically well made and passes 90 minutes in no time. We all love seeing the bad guys getting a kicking and you won,t see more bad guys get a good kicking than you do In Rambo.
What's the point? (spoiler warning) August 26, 2008 D. Jackson (UK) 1 out of 1 found this review helpful
Rambo frowns a bit, grunts, swears, blasts a few holes through some bad guys, and then cuts their heads off. ...Oops, sorry, I just gave away the whole plot. I liked Hostel, The Hills Have Eyes, Funny Games and so on, don't get me wrong, but this new Rambo installment is ultimately for sad, insecure, power-hungry people who get a kick out of watching innocent beings getting raped, humiliated, cut apart, beaten and mutilated until death. That's basically what happens throughout the entire film... until a sickeningly false happy ending- in which everything is supposed to be 'OK' again, just because the nice blonde lady is reunited with her partner. (Yea, you're supposed to forget about the hundreds of other innocent people who are murdered along the way.) I am (was) a massive Rambo fan, so this addition was never going to get 2 stars or less... and to make this review sound less of a complaint, I'll mention that some of the scenery looks nice, and it's not too long- so whoever is being entertained won't loose interest very easily. For once though, I agree with the critics: The new Rambo film is big, stupid and pointless- just like the character.
Better than expected August 24, 2008 S J Buck (Kent, UK) I wanted to hate this movie so much, but came away having been throughly entertained (in an extremly violent way) for 90 minutes. It was a blood splattered 90 minutes but it was better than I expected. Rambo has retired to Thailand, but he's still in top shape. Stallone of course is still in good shape aged 60. I won't discuss steroids at this point.... A group of missionaries are trying to helped the sick and wounded in Burmah. The people are living under a military regime which is brutal in the extreme. The missionaries are captured and Rambo ultimataly helps a group of mercenaries to get them out. The body count is vast, it might be a record for I know. If you have any problems with watching bloody scenes I'd give this film a miss as there are a great many which involve huge blood loss! The ending is well done, almost taking you full circle back to First Blood from 1982. However making comparisons with that film are a mistake as it isn't in the same class. The main reason is a lack of another major character to support Stallone. In First blood we had the always excellent Brian Denehy as the local Sheriff, in Rambo there's nobody. However overall I shall be quite happy to watch this again when the circumstances arise.
Popcorn at the ready! August 15, 2008 benmully Now don't get me wrong, war is a horrible affair, but I was right in the mood for this film! Loads of carnage, people being shot, blown up, eaten by pigs, etc...! Stallone doesn't say much for the whole film, but certainly ups the action stakes. A thoroughly bloody movie, just don't expect a deep story line ;-)
ok August 15, 2008 sheila ismail well its better than rambo 3 but not as good as rambo 2 but is still better than terminator 3,die hard 4.0, avp requiem and many other sequels attempting to bring old franchises back from the brink.while its not particuly well acted or written it is well made and the action scenes are very well done the graphic graturitious violence will upset some viewers
|
|
| InsideTheMarket.co.uk | | Buy With Confidence |

Secure Checkout by Amazon.com
Your order is secure
and backed by Amazon's
A-to-Z Guarantee
which guarantees your purchase, the condition of the item you buy, and
its timely delivery. |
|
|
|